This is great but two questions remain for me - sure looks like the bullet is coming from Charlie's left. And the trousers the fellow you have with the Mauser are baggy, whereas the Tyler's jeans were tight-fitting. Do you think through disinformation the killers were organized enough to leak different videos with alternate narrative to completely confuse us (a la JFK)?
I am wondering if we will ever learn the whole truth, Margot. So far it seems like JFK's assassination, because of parts that don't add up--or fit together.
I can't see how a person could climb stairs up to a roof wearing tight pants with a big rifle wedged against his leg.
There were multiple phones with cameras taking photos and videos on Sept.10. Surely the police would want to review for additional information.
I am wondering why the door to the roof was unlocked; why the shooter didn't leave the gun with its messaged cartridges on the roof: does the bullet that killed Charlie match the bullets and gun found in the woods...many questions!
Larry, thank you for your clear description, and the picture evidence, of exactly what transpired in that critical second of time. I have viewed the first 2 minutes of videos (Michael Jaco's is the worst) that I determined were in my opinion Disinformation meant to confuse 😕 the the viewers, but I don't know enough about ballistics to say why they were wrong. Again, thank for your clear explanation.
I don't know Larry, a lot of things keep emerging that tip the scales to Charlie being shot from his upper/right/rear with his lower left neck being the exit wound.
There is recent video showing the camera to Charlie's rear (you can see it in the above images) being removed from the active crime scene by a man who was not in any kind of uniform. Why police allowed this kind of evidence removal/tampering to occur is unknown, however, there is no doubt that it happened. Candace Owens claims that footage from this removed video camera was leaked to her, she examined it, and claims that there was no exit wound and no blood in the rear of Charlie's neck.
It is getting increasingly difficult to argue against the shot from upper/right and slightly behind.
In any case, the plot is increasingly thickening...who was the guy that removed the camera? Did he somehow know that the reverse camera angle would provide the definitive evidence against a frontal shot, and take it away before anyone could seize and bury it? Or was he trying to bury the evidence himself, but it somehow leaked to Candace anyways? Of course leaking to Candace guarantees that she will talk about it from a big platform and get the word out, nobody can keep her quiet.
This is great but two questions remain for me - sure looks like the bullet is coming from Charlie's left. And the trousers the fellow you have with the Mauser are baggy, whereas the Tyler's jeans were tight-fitting. Do you think through disinformation the killers were organized enough to leak different videos with alternate narrative to completely confuse us (a la JFK)?
I am wondering if we will ever learn the whole truth, Margot. So far it seems like JFK's assassination, because of parts that don't add up--or fit together.
I can't see how a person could climb stairs up to a roof wearing tight pants with a big rifle wedged against his leg.
There were multiple phones with cameras taking photos and videos on Sept.10. Surely the police would want to review for additional information.
I am wondering why the door to the roof was unlocked; why the shooter didn't leave the gun with its messaged cartridges on the roof: does the bullet that killed Charlie match the bullets and gun found in the woods...many questions!
Depressing
Larry, thank you for your clear description, and the picture evidence, of exactly what transpired in that critical second of time. I have viewed the first 2 minutes of videos (Michael Jaco's is the worst) that I determined were in my opinion Disinformation meant to confuse 😕 the the viewers, but I don't know enough about ballistics to say why they were wrong. Again, thank for your clear explanation.
I don't know Larry, a lot of things keep emerging that tip the scales to Charlie being shot from his upper/right/rear with his lower left neck being the exit wound.
There is recent video showing the camera to Charlie's rear (you can see it in the above images) being removed from the active crime scene by a man who was not in any kind of uniform. Why police allowed this kind of evidence removal/tampering to occur is unknown, however, there is no doubt that it happened. Candace Owens claims that footage from this removed video camera was leaked to her, she examined it, and claims that there was no exit wound and no blood in the rear of Charlie's neck.
The best video I've seen that makes connects the dots with the shot direction is the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbaQadkqkzI
It is getting increasingly difficult to argue against the shot from upper/right and slightly behind.
In any case, the plot is increasingly thickening...who was the guy that removed the camera? Did he somehow know that the reverse camera angle would provide the definitive evidence against a frontal shot, and take it away before anyone could seize and bury it? Or was he trying to bury the evidence himself, but it somehow leaked to Candace anyways? Of course leaking to Candace guarantees that she will talk about it from a big platform and get the word out, nobody can keep her quiet.