The CIA/Mossad Operation to Spark a Color Revolution in Iran has Failed
The CIA/Mossad plan to spark a color revolution in Iran, which has attracted global attention and a tsunami of propaganda pieces portraying the Iranian protests as a massive, unstoppable popular movement, has failed. Yes, protests continue in some parts of the country, but Iranian security forces have taken off the gloves and are fighting back. Casualty estimates are all over the board… Ranging from hundreds to thousands dead. Iranian officials have announced that the alleged ring leaders of the violent protests will be publicly executed starting Wednesday.
While Trump is now promising to try to come to the aid of the protestors, his promise appears to be more rhetorical than substantive. According to a report by the Jerusalem Post:
US President Donald Trump is expected to assist Iranians who are protesting nationwide against the Islamic Republic regime, several sources familiar with the details of the discussions held in recent days told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.
“Trump has essentially decided to help the protesters in Iran. What he has not yet decided is the ‘how’ and the ‘when,’” they said. . . .
“The spectrum ranges from a military option, namely strikes against regime targets, to cyber support against the regime, to providing Starlink systems to help protesters,” one source told the Post.
“While the Trump administration does not believe that the Iranian regime is collapsing, it definitely sees problems and cracks that did not exist a week ago,” the source added.
However, the British newspaper, The Telegraph, dampens expectations that immediate military action is on the agenda:
US media reported that officials would on Tuesday give Mr Trump options for a number of non-lethal measures, including amplifying anti-government criticism online and deploying secretive cyber weapons against Iranian military and civilian sites.
Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, are expected to attend the briefing.
Commanders in the region have told officials that they need to “consolidate US military positions and prepare defences” before carrying out any military strikes against security services responsible for the bloody crackdown on demonstrations.
A report in the Washington Post corroborates The Telegraph report that the Trump administration is just starting to weigh courses of action:
Options under review, the Journal reported, could include deploying cyberweapons against Iranian military and civilian sites, imposing additional economic sanctions on the Iranian government and launching military strikes.
While CIA front groups continue to supply the Western media with reports of large protests in cities such as Mashdad, the reality on the ground is otherwise. Here’s a video from Mashdad recorded earlier today (nighttime in Iran) of pro-regime elements filling the square:
The CIA and Mossad seem to have forgotten that in order to effect a successful regime change they must have the military and the security services under control. Let’s assume that there were a total of one million protestors scattered among the cities of Iran. That’s still only a little more than 1% of the total population of Iran. While many Iranians are angry or disillusioned with the government of President Pezeshkian’s mishandling of the Iranian economy, that does not mean the majority of Iranians are ready to blame the Ayatollah Khameni.
What are the indicators that the US will strike Iran? The US should have at least one carrier task force in the region, at least a couple of squadrons of fighter/bombers, and the hardening or evacuation of US military bases in the region. So far there is no sign of such activity.
Here is my recent interview with Kim Iverson:
"What are the indicators that the US will strike Iran? The US should have at least one carrier task force in the region, at least a couple of squadrons of fighter/bombers, and the hardening or evacuation of US military bases in the region. So far there is no sign of such activity."
John Kiriakou said the same thing for Venezuela.. lucky us that CIA training holds true!
I think Donald Trump's general strategy to deal with Israel and Netanyahu is to (1) violently agree with Netanyahu in public, and boast about taking down Iran (or Venezuela) in one strike, in 72 hours, or simply "will smash them". (2) activates US intelligence and special forces to attack a smaller target marginally related to what Israel wants. Sometimes a bit more show of force (like in Venezuela), but rarely with uniformed boots on the ground. (3) a lot of bribes and a small and short air campaign (Venezuela) or slightly longer with a lot of bombing on empty deserts (Syria, and coming to Lebanon soon) (4) when AIPAC really pushes him or when Israel gets into deep trouble (like the end of 12-day war), Trump will consult with his business acquaintance but the real strategist, Linda McMahon, about how to play a fake game. Something like the American bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities will happen next. The attack will go in at the designated time, along pre-agreed flight path, drop agreed-on ammunition with full cooperation from the ground crew to maximize the visual and aural effects. Make sure a good propaganda video clip can be made out of the bombing. (5) The other nation will make a very conservative, well announced counter-strike, usually at a point of no interest, but not always. Just one light touch on the wrist, strictly according to the script. Exactly like how they play in professional wrestling.
Well, all the above are purely my speculations. But think about it this way: if you don't do something along the requested line, your family member could be in danger, you yourself can be assassinated by your own bodyguards. If you cut the budgets of MIC, there are more than enough former military personnel now needing some money to pay off their cars, waiting to be employed. Actually, these people can be even more ruthless and competent than the US special forces. The US special forces, even if they are unquestionably loyal to the POTUS, they are not tasked to protect the president or to execute POTUS orders to take down, say, the top five CEOs in the MIC. POTUS is a great title. But if you cannot even change where your bodyguards stand or do, what power do you have? I am not joking. This was roughly the situation in the second half of the Ming dynasty in Chinese history.