While the West is fixated on Monday’s talks between Russia and Ukraine, the situation in the Baltic Sea is heating up and presents a risk of naval warfare between Russia and NATO.
It seems no one is afraid of Putin, the legalist, or WW III. Martin Armstrong says the European elite need war to save themselves. Probably true. They all love their bunkers while we all kill each other after the EMP hits and have nothing and are very unhappy. Putin needs to be scarier, which he will probably will be after negotiations are dumped. Problem is, this is a negotiated war with the bridges over the Dnieper still standing. All the red lines are turning pink. Oddly, it seems to all depend on Trump with the Europeans unable to go it alone. And what's with the "now we need to go to war with China." I don't want a war with China. China isn't Russia, and the US can't win a naval war against China. It's all about the chip foundries in Taiwan and if these facilities, owned by Americans, were to get blown up, that would end Western manufacturing everywhere. Really dumb to fight over businesses that need clean room cleanliness in a war.
Well, I'm no geo-political expert. I have a view that might be called "tainted." So be it. All I can tell you is that I've had 74 years of observation of that which is called "the West," especially my country, the United States. I have a couple of Substack articles [actually, one is a 19-part series] that offer my perspective of an underlying cause of continuing conflict between the West and "eebody else and dey Mamma." [Pardon my ghetto--or not.]
First, there's my "No More Niggers in Russia" article:
This last link is to Part 19, but links to each of the other 18 parts are at the top of Part 19.
I would suggest that one not assume that the themes presented in those articles are "too parochial," in the sense of being limited to the American cultural experience. They are not limited to the American experience, and go beyond the American experience to a global reality that informs the geo-political policy of the United States.
I have often heard experts such as Larry Johnson, Col. Douglas MacGregor, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, Col. Karen Kwiatkowsky, Professor John Mearsheimer, Mat Hoh, Phil Giraldi, Scott Ritter, Amb Charles Freeman, Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Tony Shafer and others use the word "irrational" to describe U.S. foreign policy, or elements of U.S. foreign policy.
Yeah....right. It's true. Carrying a policy which includes a very, very, very strong element, within U.S. foreign policy, that reflects an obvious desire for Euro [white] global racial supremacy over the rest of the world is quite irrational. I agree. And I submit that it is that unspoken policy that represents the irrational element that all of the above-mentioned experts have--at one time or another--alluded to by stating that U.S. foreign policy is "irrational."
Scott Ritter [never one to hold his tongue] said it explicitly, for four minutes and 21 seconds, non-stop. I should not have been surprised, although I was. In the second video within the following Substack submission of mine, you will hear him explicitly mention global racial supremacy and its impact on U.S. foreign policy:
Note that that video is within Part 12 of my 19-part series. There is a reason I wrote both the series, as well as the article, No More Niggers in Russia: It is my sincere belief that, unless and until the U.S. faces that unspoken "irrational" force driving U.S. foreign policy, then nothing will ever change. I'm sorry to say that the fiction of, and hope for, global racial supremacy is a disease. And if it ain't fixed, then we all are going to be swimming up the proverbial shit's creek, eliminated from this earth because of the Euro-elite's racial inebriation.
Hey, as my ex-wife would tell me when I would get pissed at her criticisms of me, "The truth is the light." 😡🤬🥴 Her "truth" didn't do much for our marriage. But the saying, generically, is 100%.
It seems no one is afraid of Putin, the legalist, or WW III. Martin Armstrong says the European elite need war to save themselves. Probably true. They all love their bunkers while we all kill each other after the EMP hits and have nothing and are very unhappy. Putin needs to be scarier, which he will probably will be after negotiations are dumped. Problem is, this is a negotiated war with the bridges over the Dnieper still standing. All the red lines are turning pink. Oddly, it seems to all depend on Trump with the Europeans unable to go it alone. And what's with the "now we need to go to war with China." I don't want a war with China. China isn't Russia, and the US can't win a naval war against China. It's all about the chip foundries in Taiwan and if these facilities, owned by Americans, were to get blown up, that would end Western manufacturing everywhere. Really dumb to fight over businesses that need clean room cleanliness in a war.
😀 😃
Well, I'm no geo-political expert. I have a view that might be called "tainted." So be it. All I can tell you is that I've had 74 years of observation of that which is called "the West," especially my country, the United States. I have a couple of Substack articles [actually, one is a 19-part series] that offer my perspective of an underlying cause of continuing conflict between the West and "eebody else and dey Mamma." [Pardon my ghetto--or not.]
First, there's my "No More Niggers in Russia" article:
https://ronchism.substack.com/p/no-more-niggers-in-russia?utm_source=publication-search
Second, there is my 19-part series, "Is this Black enough for you? Has global racial supremacy been an unspoken force driving U.S foreign policy?"
https://ronchism.substack.com/p/part-19-and-final-is-this-black-enough?utm_source=publication-search
This last link is to Part 19, but links to each of the other 18 parts are at the top of Part 19.
I would suggest that one not assume that the themes presented in those articles are "too parochial," in the sense of being limited to the American cultural experience. They are not limited to the American experience, and go beyond the American experience to a global reality that informs the geo-political policy of the United States.
I have often heard experts such as Larry Johnson, Col. Douglas MacGregor, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, Col. Karen Kwiatkowsky, Professor John Mearsheimer, Mat Hoh, Phil Giraldi, Scott Ritter, Amb Charles Freeman, Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Tony Shafer and others use the word "irrational" to describe U.S. foreign policy, or elements of U.S. foreign policy.
Yeah....right. It's true. Carrying a policy which includes a very, very, very strong element, within U.S. foreign policy, that reflects an obvious desire for Euro [white] global racial supremacy over the rest of the world is quite irrational. I agree. And I submit that it is that unspoken policy that represents the irrational element that all of the above-mentioned experts have--at one time or another--alluded to by stating that U.S. foreign policy is "irrational."
Scott Ritter [never one to hold his tongue] said it explicitly, for four minutes and 21 seconds, non-stop. I should not have been surprised, although I was. In the second video within the following Substack submission of mine, you will hear him explicitly mention global racial supremacy and its impact on U.S. foreign policy:
https://ronchism.substack.com/p/part-12-is-this-black-enough-for
Note that that video is within Part 12 of my 19-part series. There is a reason I wrote both the series, as well as the article, No More Niggers in Russia: It is my sincere belief that, unless and until the U.S. faces that unspoken "irrational" force driving U.S. foreign policy, then nothing will ever change. I'm sorry to say that the fiction of, and hope for, global racial supremacy is a disease. And if it ain't fixed, then we all are going to be swimming up the proverbial shit's creek, eliminated from this earth because of the Euro-elite's racial inebriation.
Hey, as my ex-wife would tell me when I would get pissed at her criticisms of me, "The truth is the light." 😡🤬🥴 Her "truth" didn't do much for our marriage. But the saying, generically, is 100%.
Peace (or not)
The Scarlet Pimpernel (Don't try to guess)